跳伞教练 · NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2024年12月2日）

案件背景

申请人以EB-2类别（高等学位专业人士或科学、艺术或商业领域特殊能力人士）申请移民，并请求国家利益豁免职位邀请要求；其拟从事领域为在美国继续担任跳伞教练。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   德州服务中心主任拒绝该申请，认定记录未能证明申请人符合所请求的国家利益豁免资格。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish the Petitioner's eligibility for the requested national interest waiver.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   AAO驳回后续上诉；在该上诉决定中提及申请人不符合基础EB-2移民分类资格，但脚注说明该问题未在原审主任决定中处理，故未仅以此为由驳回上诉；同时认定不满足Dhanasar框架第一项要求。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed a subsequent appeal as well as a motion to reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   In our appellate decision, we determined that the Petitioner was not eligible for the underlying EB-2 immigrant classification, nor did he meet the first prong ofthe analytical framework set forth in Matter ofDhanasar

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   Because the issue of the Petitioner's ineligibility for the requested irnrnigrant classification was not previously addressed in the Director's decision, we did not dismiss the appeal on this basis alone.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 复议动议

   AAO驳回申请人第一次复议动议，认定其未证明先前决定在法律或政策适用上错误，也未证明依据决定时记录先前决定不正确。

   核对原文依据

   we dismissed the Petitioner's first motion to reconsider because he did not establish that we erred as a matter of law or policy, nor did he establish our prior decision was incorrect based on the record at the time ofthe decision.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
4. 复议动议

   申请人再次提出复议动议，并再次提交最初上诉时的同一份书面论证意见，仅顺带提及AAO驳回其复议动议。

   核对原文依据

   On motion, the Petitioner again submits the same brief initially submitted on appeal with only a passing acknowledgement of our dismissal of his motion to reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：核对本次动议是否针对AAO驳回第一次复议动议的最新决定指出法律或政策适用错误，而非重复最初上诉书面论证意见；这是8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(3)的审查边界。
  核对原文依据

  The scope of a motion is limited to "the prior decision" and "the latest decision in the proceeding."

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：区分原审主任仅以国家利益豁免资格拒绝，与AAO在上诉阶段另行认定基础EB-2分类资格不足；后者未在原审主任决定中处理。
  核对原文依据

  Because the issue of the Petitioner's ineligibility for the requested irnrnigrant classification was not previously addressed in the Director's decision, we did not dismiss the appeal on this basis alone.

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页