护士 · NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2024年12月5日）

案件背景

申请人以护士身份提交I-140职业移民申请，寻求EB-2高级学位专业人士分类，并请求豁免职位邀请要求（国家利益豁免）。原审主任认定其符合高级学位专业人士资格，但未认定豁免职位邀请符合国家利益。本次程序为对AAO先前驳回合并重新开放与复议动议之决定再次提出的合并动议。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   德州服务中心主任拒绝申请，认定申请人符合高级学位专业人士资格，但未证明豁免职位邀请要求符合国家利益。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional, but he did not establish that a waiver of the job offer requirement is in the national interest.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   AAO驳回上诉，同意主任意见，认定申请人未证明其拟从事事业的国家重要性，即Dhanasar第一要素；对第二、第三要素保留审查。

   核对原文依据

   In our decision dismissing the appeal, we agreed with the Director's decision that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the national importance of her proposed endeavor under the first prong of the Dhanasar analytical framework.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   We reserved our review ofthe Petitioner's eligibility under Dhanasar's second and third prongs.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
3. 先前动议

   AAO驳回申请人先前提出的合并重新开放与复议动议：就重新开放而言，认定其提交的扩展事业计划等新证据不构成具有潜在改变结果的新事实；并指出该新计划可能构成对原申请拟从事事业的实质变更，因而不能证明申请时资格；就复议而言，认定其未指明上诉决定在适用Dhanasar或法律政策上的错误。

   核对原文依据

   we dismissed the Petitioner's motion to reopen concluding her submission of new documentary evidence, specifically her plan describing her expanded proposed endeavor, did not constitute new facts with the potential to have the claimed broad impact in her field commensurate with national importance.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   In addition, we noted that her new plan for her proposed endeavor may be a material change to what she initially proposed in her petition and, therefore, does not establish her eligibility at the time of filing.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   In dismissing the motion to reconsider, we concluded that the Petitioner did not specify any error in our application of Dhanasar or any other legal error misapplication of policy in our appeal decision.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
4. 本次动议

   申请人再次提出合并重新开放与复议动议，提交推荐信、注册护士考试资格及预计考试日期邮件、职位邀请信，主张其专业资格、经验与事业进展使其处于推进拟从事事业的有利地位。AAO将表格仅勾选复议但另附页勾选重新开放，且其支持陈述同时提及重新开放与复议，按合并动议审查。

   核对原文依据

   Although the Form 1-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, marks only the box for a motion to reconsider, the Petitioner submitted an additional page two for the Form 1-290B marking the box for a motion to reopen. Her statement submitted in support references a motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   Specifically, the Petitioner submits recommendation letters relating to her professional experience, emails indicating her eligibility and expected test date for her registered nurse examination, and an employment offer letter.

   查看英文原件 · 第 3 页
5. 本次决定

   AAO驳回重新开放动议与复议动议，维持先前认定：申请人未证明Dhanasar第一要素下的资格，因而不符合且不值得国家利益豁免；继续保留第二、第三要素的审查。

   核对原文依据

   We affirm our previous determination that the Petitioner has not established her eligibility under the first prong of the Dhanasar analytical framework, and she is thus not eligible for and does not merit a national interest waiver.

   查看英文原件 · 第 4 页

   ORDER: The motion to reopen is dismissed.

   查看英文原件 · 第 4 页

   FURTHER ORDER: The motion to reconsider is dismissed.

   查看英文原件 · 第 4 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：核对本次动议的审查范围应限于先前合并动议决定及程序中最新决定，而非重新审理最初申请；申请人的书面论证意见是否针对最新动议决定指明错误，是判断复议动议的关键。
  核对原文依据

  The scope of any motion is limited to "the prior decision" and "the latest decision in the proceeding."

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：核对新证据的关联要素时，应区分Dhanasar第一要素下具体事业的国家重要性与第二要素下申请人本人是否处于有利地位；推荐信、考试资格邮件与职位邀请信在本案被归入后者。
  核对原文依据

  The issue for national importance under Dhanasar's first prong is whether the specific endeavor that the Petitioner proposes to undertake has national importance.

  查看英文原件 · 第 3 页
• 阅读提示：第二、第三要素在本案为保留事项，不能据本次决定推断其已被认定失败或通过；本次决定未对其作实体评价。
  核对原文依据

  We will continue to reserve the Petitioner's eligibility under the second and third Dhanasar prongs.

  查看英文原件 · 第 4 页