AI 翻译，非官方，以原文为准。译文由模型按原文段落生成，法规引用与判例名保留英文；USCIS 隐去的姓名与机构以「[已隐去]」表示。
行政上诉办公室裁定驳回上诉，理由是申请人已成为永久居民，本次上诉无实际意义。本次决定未对原审关于国家重要性、申请人是否处于推进事业的有利位置以及豁免职位邀请要求是否有益的实质认定作出重新审查或推翻。
As the Petitioner is now a permanent resident, the instant appeal will be dismissed as moot.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页申请人是一名研究人员，寻求EB-2职业移民分类（作为持有高等学位的专业人士）并请求国家利益豁免职位邀请要求。德州服务中心主任拒绝该申请，认为拟议事业不具有国家重要性、申请人未处于推进该事业的有利位置、豁免职位邀请要求不会有益。
The Petitioner, a researcher, seeks employment-based second preference (EB-2) immigrant classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, as well as a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement attached to this classification.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that that the proposed endeavor was of national importance, that the Petitioner is well positioned to advance the endeavor, or that it would be beneficial to waive the requirements of a job offer.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页德州服务中心主任拒绝该申请，认为记录未证明拟议事业具有国家重要性、申请人处于推进该事业的有利位置、豁免职位邀请要求有益。
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that that the proposed endeavor was of national importance, that the Petitioner is well positioned to advance the endeavor, or that it would be beneficial to waive the requirements of a job offer.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页申请人就德州服务中心决定向行政上诉办公室提出上诉。
Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision查看英文原件 · 第 1 页The matter is now before us on appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页记录显示申请人另行提交了另一份申请并获批准，其登记永久居留的申请随后于2024年10月15日获批准。
A review of records shows that the Petitioner filed another petition, which was approved and the Petitioner's application to register permanent residence was subsequently approved on October 15, 2024.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。
行政上诉办公室依据记录审查上诉；若申请人已通过另一份申请获得永久居民身份，则本上诉因无实际意义而被驳回。
申请人就德州服务中心拒绝其EB-2国家利益豁免申请提出上诉。
德州服务中心主任拒绝申请，认为未证明拟议事业具有国家重要性、申请人处于推进该事业的有利位置、豁免职位邀请要求有益。
A review of records shows that the Petitioner filed another petition, which was approved and the Petitioner's application to register permanent residence was subsequently approved on October 15, 2024.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页行政上诉办公室审查记录后发现，申请人另行提交的另一份申请已获批准，其登记永久居留的申请随后于2024年10月15日获批准。由于申请人现已成为永久居民，本次上诉被认定为无实际意义并予以驳回。行政上诉办公室未对原审关于国家重要性、有利位置或豁免有益性的实质认定进行重新审查。
A review of records shows that the Petitioner filed another petition, which was approved and the Petitioner's application to register permanent residence was subsequently approved on October 15, 2024. As the Petitioner is now a permanent resident, the instant appeal will be dismissed as moot.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that that the proposed endeavor was of national importance, that the Petitioner is well positioned to advance the endeavor, or that it would be beneficial to waive the requirements of a job offer.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页As the Petitioner is now a permanent resident, the instant appeal will be dismissed as moot.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页美国公民及移民服务局 行政上诉办公室 非先例决定
案号：19143446 日期：2025年2月25日
对德克萨斯服务中心决定的上诉
表格 I-140，外籍工人移民申请（国家利益豁免）
申请人是一名研究人员，寻求作为持有高级学位的专业人士获得职业移民第二优先（EB-2）移民分类，并寻求豁免与该分类相关的职位聘用要求。见《移民与国籍法》（该法）第203(b)(2)条，8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)。
德克萨斯服务中心审理主任否决了该申请，认定记录未能证明拟议事业具有国家重要性、申请人处于有利地位以推进该事业，或豁免职位聘用要求将是有益的。此事现依据 8 C.F.R. § 103.3 提交至本办公室进行上诉审查。
记录审查显示，申请人提交了另一份申请，该申请获得批准，申请人的永久居留登记申请随后于2024年10月15日获得批准。由于申请人现已成为永久居民，本上诉因无实际意义而被驳回。
裁定：上诉被驳回。
原文：USCIS 非先例裁决 PDF（2025-02-25）
本页为 USCIS 公开的 AAO 非先例裁决译文，不是美杰华经手的案例，不构成法律意见；个案结果取决于各自证据。翻译模型：deepseek-flash，生成于 2026-10-31。
