SAP HANA Basis Administrator · 普通 EB-2 职业移民：发回重审（2023年2月27日）

案件背景

申请人（Petitioner）拟雇用受益人（Beneficiary）担任“SAP HANA Basis Administrator”，请求按第二优先职业移民类别将其归类为商业领域特殊能力人士。原申请为I-140表格；表格勾选1.d（高等学位专业人士或特殊能力人士且不申请劳工证豁免），但附页说明依特殊能力规则提交EB-2申请，支持材料亦表明申请基于商业领域特殊能力。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   内布拉斯加服务中心主任拒绝原申请，理由为劳工证不支持以高等学位专业人士身份提交的申请，因为职位最低资格不要求学位。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the labor certification did not support a petition filed on behalf of an individual holding an advanced degree because the minimum qualifications for the position did not require a degree.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   申请人就主任决定提出上诉，主张主任未考虑证据，也未按所请求的商业领域特殊能力类别提供有理由的分析。

   核对原文依据

   On appeal, the Petitioner asserts that the Director erred by failing to consider the evidence and provide a reasoned analysis for its denial under the requested exceptional ability in business classification.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 上诉审查

   行政上诉办公室进行重新审查，认定主任似乎错误地按高等学位专业人士而非商业领域特殊能力人士审理申请，因此撤回主任决定并发回重审。

   核对原文依据

   Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   Because the Director appears to have mistakenly adjudicated the petition as one filed on behalf of an advanced degree professional, instead of considering the Beneficiary's qualifications as a noncitizen of exceptional ability in business, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：可核对I-140表格第2部分勾选1.d及附页说明，确认申请请求的是商业领域特殊能力类别而非仅高等学位专业人士类别。
  核对原文依据

  However, the Petitioner included a supplemental page to the Form 1-140 that specified they were "filing this EB-2 1-140 Petition pursuant to Exceptional Ability regulations."

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
• 阅读提示：可核对主任决定中关于“没有任何关于受益人具有特殊能力的陈述”的表述，以及AAO认定主任似乎按高等学位专业人士审理的说明；本次决定未评价特殊能力证据的实质充分性。
  核对原文依据

  The Director found that "no representations have been made that the beneficiary has exceptional

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

  Because the Director appears to have mistakenly adjudicated the petition as one filed on behalf of an advanced degree professional, instead of considering the Beneficiary's qualifications as a noncitizen of exceptional ability in business, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：可核对劳工证中职位最低资格是否要求学位；该材料在原审被用于高等学位专业人士类别，AAO本次未对其内容作实质重新认定。
  核对原文依据

  the labor certification did not support a petition filed on behalf of an individual holding an advanced degree because the minimum qualifications for the position did not require a degree.

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页