NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2024年7月30日）

案件背景

申请人以专业人士（持有高级学位）身份申请EB-2移民分类，并请求豁免职位邀请及劳工证的国家利益豁免；德州服务中心原审认定其符合高级学位专业人士分类，但未认定国家利益豁免。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   德州服务中心拒绝原申请：认定申请人符合高级学位专业人士分类，但未认定豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that he had not established that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   申请人提出上诉，但未在提交上诉后30个日历日内向AAO提交书面论证意见或补充证据；其将书面论证意见误寄至USCIS Phoenix Lockbox而非AAO，AAO据此简易驳回上诉。

   核对原文依据

   we explained that the Petitioner's appeal was not accompanied by a brief and/or additional evidence, nor was it submitted to the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) within 30 calendar days of filling the appeal

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   incorrectly sent the brief in support of his appeal to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Phoenix Lockbox and not the AAO, as required.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
3. 动议

   申请人提出合并的重开与复议动议；AAO认定其未就先前驳回动议的决定提出新事实或指出错误，驳回该合并动议。

   核对原文依据

   We subsequently dismissed combined motions to reopen and reconsider. The matter is now before us on combined motions to reopen and reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   Here, the Petitioner has not provided new facts to establish that we erred in dismissing the prior motion to reopen.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
4. 本次动议

   申请人再次提出合并的重开与复议动议，并提交书面论证意见，重申其符合所请求分类的要求，但未回应AAO先前决定或主张其有误。

   核对原文依据

   With the instant motions, the Petitioner provides a brief, again outlining his contention that he meets the requirements for his requested classification, but does not acknowledge our prior decision, or contend that it was erroneous.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：本案程序范围限于对AAO最新驳回动议决定的动议审查，不重新全面审理原EB-2国家利益豁免申请；原审已认定高级学位专业人士分类成立，本次未改变该认定。
  核对原文依据

  Because the scope of a motion is limited to the prior decision, we will only review the latest decision in these proceedings.

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
• 阅读提示：核对上诉阶段材料是否在提交上诉后30个日历日内寄至AAO而非USCIS Phoenix Lockbox，是理解先前简易驳回及后续动议链条的关键程序事实。
  核对原文依据

  incorrectly sent the brief in support of his appeal to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Phoenix Lockbox and not the AAO, as required.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：本次动议所附书面论证意见被评价为重复已考虑内容，未针对最新决定提出新事实或法律适用错误；这不等于对原申请国家利益豁免实体标准的重新认定。
  核对原文依据

  The Petitioner's brief in his current motion merely restates facts and issues we have already considered in our previous decisions.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页