商业顾问 · NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2024年7月31日）

案件背景

申请人以商业顾问身份提交I-140表格，寻求EB-2职业移民分类（作为持有高级学位的专业人士）以及国家利益豁免，免除该分类附带的职位邀请要求。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   德州服务中心主任拒绝了该申请，认定记录未能证明申请人有资格获得国家利益下的职位邀请要求豁免。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the Petitioner is eligible for a waiver ofthe job offer requirement in the national interest.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   申请人于2023年7月7日提交I-290B表格。申请人声称其于2023年8月3日及时提交了上诉书面论证意见，并提交了美国邮政服务（USPS）文件，显示收件日期为2023年8月4日，以及其此前打算提交的上诉书面论证意见。

   核对原文依据

   The record reflects that the Petitioner filed his Form I-290B on July 7, 2023. The Petitioner claims that he timely filed his appeal brief on August 3, 2023, and he submits documentation from the United States Postal Service (USPS) showing a receipt date of August 4, 2023, along with the appeal brief that he previously intended to submit to us.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 上诉

   USPS文件显示申请人错误地将上诉书面论证意见寄至佛蒙特服务中心，而非直接寄至AAO办公室，违反了I-290B表格说明。

   核对原文依据

   However, the USPS documents show that the Petitioner incorrectly mailed his appeal brief to the Vermont Service Center instead of sending it directly to our office, contrary to the Form I-290B instructions.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
4. 上诉

   AAO于2024年1月17日对I-290B表格作出裁决，简易驳回上诉，因为申请人未在I-290B表格上表明的提交后30天内向AAO提交书面论证意见和/或额外证据。

   核对原文依据

   We summarily dismissed the subsequent appeal as the Petitioner did not identify any specific legal or factual error in the Director's decision on his Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B), and did not submit his brief and/or additional evidence to us within 30 days of filing the Form I-290B as he indicated he would on his Form I-290B.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   As the Petitioner's evidence does not show that he properly filed his appeal brief with us prior to our adjudication of his Form I-290B on January 17, 2024, we conclude that our summary dismissal of the appeal according to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v) was proper.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
5. 动议

   事项现以合并的重开动议和复议动议提交AAO审理。申请人在重开动议中提交了额外证据。

   核对原文依据

   The matter is now before us on combined motions to reopen and reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   Although the Petitioner has submitted additional evidence in support of the motion to reopen, he did not demonstrate on motion that he followed form instructions and mailed his brief to the correct mailing address.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：核对I-290B表格说明中关于提交后上诉书面论证意见和/或证据“必须直接寄至AAO”的要求，以及USPS文件显示的邮寄地址是否为AAO而非佛蒙特服务中心。
  核对原文依据

  that any appeal brief and/or evidence submitted after filing a Form I-290B "must be sent directly to the AAO."

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

  However, the USPS documents show that the Petitioner incorrectly mailed his appeal brief to the Vermont Service Center instead of sending it directly to our office, contrary to the Form I-290B instructions.

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
• 阅读提示：核对AAO于2024年1月17日裁决I-290B表格前，记录中是否显示上诉书面论证意见已正确提交至AAO；本次动议审查限于AAO最新决定，不涉及EB-2分类资格或国家利益豁免的实质重新审理。
  核对原文依据

  As the Petitioner's evidence does not show that he properly filed his appeal brief with us prior to our adjudication of his Form I-290B on January 17, 2024, we conclude that our summary dismissal of the appeal according to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v) was proper.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

  Our review on motion is limited to reviewing our latest decision. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(l)(ii).

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页