NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2024年6月28日）

案件背景

申请人寻求以持有高级学位的专业人士身份获得EB-2分类，并申请国家利益豁免，免除该分类附带的职位邀请要求；其拟议事业为设立药房。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   德州服务中心主任拒绝该申请，认定申请人未证明其符合国家利益豁免。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that he qualifies for the national interest waiver.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   AAO于2023年12月作出上诉决定，驳回后续上诉；该决定提及申请人的论点，引用其陈述、他人信件及商业计划信息，认定其计划含糊、相互矛盾且佐证不足，未证明拟议事业具有国家重要性。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed a subsequent appeal.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   In our appellate decision, we referred to the Petitioner's arguments, quoted from her statement and letters from others discussing her proposed endeavor, and cited information from a business plan.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   We concluded that the Petitioner's plans were vague, conflicting, and insufficiently corroborated, and that the Petitioner had not established the national importance of her proposed endeavor.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
3. 动议

   申请人提出合并的重开与复议动议，主张AAO未考虑其随申请及补件答复提交的全部证据，并请求重新考虑不利决定、重开申请并全面考虑所有提交文件。

   核对原文依据

   The matter is now before us on combined motions to reopen and reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   On motion, the Petitioner contests the correctness ofour prior decision, stating that we did not consider all the evidence that the Petitioner had submitted with the petition and, later, in response to a request for evidence.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   The Petitioner asks that we "reconsider the adverse decision and reopen [the petition] and give full consideration to all the submitted documents."

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
4. 动议决定

   AAO于2024年6月28日驳回重开动议和复议动议。

   核对原文依据

   Date: JUNE 28, 2024

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   ORDER: The motion to reopen is dismissed.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   FURTHER ORDER: The motion to reconsider is dismissed.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：核对重开动议是否附有新事实说明及新的书面证据，可与8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2)的要求对照。
  核对原文依据

  A motion to reopen must state new facts and be supported by documentary evidence.

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

  On motion, the Petitioner does not state any new facts and does not submit any new documentary evidence.

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
• 阅读提示：核对复议动议是否具体指出2023年12月上诉决定中的法律或政策适用错误，以及所依据的程序记录证据；动议审查范围限于该最新决定。
  核对原文依据

  The only decision properly before us on motion is our December 2023 appellate decision, not the Director's May 2023 denial of the petition.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

  The Petitioner does not identify any specific documents or other pieces of evidence that we overlooked in our appellate review of the record, and the Petitioner does not explain how discussion or consideration ofthose materials would have changed the outcome of our December 2023 decision.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：核对2023年12月上诉决定对拟议事业“含糊、相互矛盾、佐证不足”及国家重要性的具体认定，并与本次动议是否回应这些认定对照；本记录未重新评估EB-2高级学位资格。
  核对原文依据

  We concluded that the Petitioner's plans were vague, conflicting, and insufficiently corroborated, and that the Petitioner had not established the national importance of her proposed endeavor.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页