本案适用标准
复议动议须证明AAO决定基于对法律或政策的错误适用，且依据决定时记录中的证据该决定错误；8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(3)；动议范围限于“先前决定”，8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(1)(i)；申请人负有以优势证据证明资格的责任，Matter of Chawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010)。
申请人主张
申请人概括主张移民局未充分考虑首次申请及NOID答复中提交的证据，并主张其符合所请求的分类资格。
原审意见
原审主任拒绝原申请，认定未证明国家利益豁免；AAO先前驳回上诉。
首次申请及NOID答复中提交的证据
- 证明目的
- 申请人用以主张移民局未充分考虑这些证据、其符合所请求分类资格。
- AAO 如何评价
- AAO未在本次复议中重新评价这些证据的实质内容，因动议范围限于对驳回上诉决定的复议，且申请人未具体指出上诉决定中的错误或遗漏。
- 缺失、矛盾与适用限制
- 申请人未具体说明上诉中提出而AAO决定错误或遗漏的事实和法律问题；动议未针对驳回上诉的决定提出法律或政策适用错误。
核对原文依据
Therefore, we cannot consider new objections to the earlier denial, and the Petitioner cannot use the present filing to make new allegations of error at prior stages of the proceeding.
查看英文原件 · 第 1 页The Petitioner, therefore, has not specified the factual and legal issues raised on appeal that were decided in error or overlooked in our decision
查看英文原件 · 第 1 页AAO 认定与理由
AAO指出本次动议针对的是驳回上诉的决定，而非原审拒绝申请的决定，因此不能审理对早先拒绝的新异议，也不能借本次动议对先前程序阶段提出新的错误主张。申请人未具体说明上诉中提出、而AAO决定错误或遗漏的事实和法律问题，仅作概括性主张，故未满足复议动议的法定要求。
核对原文依据
A motion to reconsider must establish that our decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy and that the decision was incorrect based on the evidence in the record of proceedings at the time of the decision.
查看英文原件 · 第 1 页The filing before us is not a motion to reconsider the denial of the petition. It is a motion to reconsider our most recent decision, the dismissal of the Petitioner's appeal.
查看英文原件 · 第 1 页Rather than address our dismissal of his appeal, the Petitioner generally asserts that "[t]he Service did not give full consideration to the evidence provided ... along with the first filing and the NOID response, as should have been given" and is eligible for the requested classification.
查看英文原件 · 第 1 页The Petitioner, therefore, has not specified the factual and legal issues raised on appeal that were decided in error or overlooked in our decision and we will dismiss the Petitioner's motion to reconsider.
查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
