金融业首席执行官 · NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2025年5月6日）

案件背景

申请人以金融行业首席执行官身份提出EB-2职业移民申请，主张其属于持有高级学位的专业人士，并请求豁免职位邀请及劳工证要求。原审服务中心认定其符合高级学位专业人士分类，但未认定豁免符合国家利益。本次为针对AAO先前决定提出的重新开放与复议合并动议。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   服务中心以申请人虽符合高级学位专业人士分类、但未证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益为由拒绝申请。

   核对原文依据

   Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that be had not established that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   AAO驳回了申请人的上诉。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed the Petitioner's appeal and a subsequent motion.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 先前动议

   AAO驳回了申请人随后提出的动议；该决定指出申请人未提出新事实或证据证明其拟议事业的国家重要性，也未证明AAO关于国家重要性的认定在案卷证据下是错误的。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed the Petitioner's appeal and a subsequent motion.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   In our decision dismissing the previous motion, we indicated that the Petitioner had not presented new facts or evidence demonstrating the national importance ofhis proposed endeavor under the fust prong of the analytical framework set forth in Matter ofDhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884, 889 (AAO 2016).

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
4. 本次动议

   申请人提出重新开放与复议合并动议，主张其满足Dhanasar第一要素，并称AAO误解了其作为金融行业首席执行官拟议事业的关键要素及其预期贡献。

   核对原文依据

   The matter is now before us on combined motions to reopen and reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   On motion to reconsider, the Petitioner contends that we misinterpreted "key elements surrounding the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as a Chief Executive in the finance sector and the substantial contributions his work is projected to make within and beyond the industry."

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：本次决定仅审查针对AAO先前决定的重新开放与复议动议，不重新审理原EB-2国家利益豁免申请的实体资格；原审已认定申请人符合高级学位专业人士分类，该认定不是本次争议。
  核对原文依据

  Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner qualified for classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, but that be had not established that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

  We will not re-adjudicate the petition anew and, therefore, the underlying petition remains denied.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：核对重新开放动议是否附有新事实和文件证据，以及复议动议是否仅重复先前论点而未指出法律或政策适用错误；AAO对两者的审查标准不同。
  核对原文依据

  A motion to reopen must state new facts and be supported by documentary evidence. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2). A motion to reconsider must establish that our prior decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy and that the decision was incorrect based on the evidence in the record of proceedings at the time of the decision. 8 C.F.R. § 103.5(a)(3).

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
• 阅读提示：Dhanasar第一要素关注具体拟议事业的国家重要性，第二要素关注申请人本人；申请人关于学历和专业知识的论点被归入第二要素，不能替代第一要素的证明。
  核对原文依据

  The Petitioner's education, skills, and knowledge in his field relate to the second prong of the Dhanasar framework, which "shifts the focus from the proposed endeavor to the foreign national."

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页