AI 翻译，非官方，以原文为准。译文由模型按原文段落生成，法规引用与判例名保留英文；USCIS 隐去的姓名与机构以「[已隐去]」表示。
行政上诉办公室裁定驳回上诉。本次决定未对国家利益豁免的实质要件作出重新认定；驳回的原因是申请人已调整为永久居民，上诉所涉问题已无实际意义。
the Petitioner is presently a permanent resident and the issue in this proceeding is moot.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页申请人是一名商业管理领域的企业家及培训与发展专家，通过I-140表格寻求EB-2（高级学位专业人士）移民分类，并请求国家利益豁免职位邀请要求。原审服务中心认定其已证明符合EB-2高级学位专业人士基础资格，但未证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益。
The Petitioner, an entrepreneur in the field of business management and a training and development specialist, seeks employment-based second preference (EB-2) immigrant classification as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, as well as a national interest waiver of the job offer requirement attached to this classification.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页The Service Center Operations denied the petition, concluding that although the Petitioner established that she qualifies for the underlying EB-2 visa classification as an advanced degree professional, she did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页服务中心拒绝该申请，认定申请人虽已证明符合EB-2高级学位专业人士基础资格，但未证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益。
The Service Center Operations denied the petition, concluding that although the Petitioner established that she qualifies for the underlying EB-2 visa classification as an advanced degree professional, she did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页申请人就德州服务中心决定向行政上诉办公室提出上诉，依据8 C.F.R. § 103.3。
Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision查看英文原件 · 第 1 页The matter is now before us on appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页移民局记录显示，申请人已有获批的移民申请，并已于2025年4月调整身份为美国永久居民；申请人未撤回本次上诉。
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services records indicate that the Petitioner has an approved immigrant petition and has adjusted status to that of a U.S. permanent resident as of April 2025. While the Petitioner has not withdrawn the appeal in this proceeding, the Petitioner is presently a permanent resident and the issue in this proceeding is moot.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。
EB-2国家利益豁免职位邀请要求，见《移民与国籍法》第203(b)(2)条，8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)；上诉审理依据8 C.F.R. § 103.3。
申请人主张其应获得国家利益豁免，从而豁免职位邀请及劳工证要求。
原审认定申请人已证明EB-2高级学位专业人士基础资格，但未证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益。
行政上诉办公室未重新审查国家利益豁免的实质要件。因移民局记录显示申请人已有获批的移民申请并已于2025年4月调整为永久居民，且申请人未撤回上诉，AAO认定本次上诉所涉问题已无实际意义，故驳回上诉。
The Service Center Operations denied the petition, concluding that although the Petitioner established that she qualifies for the underlying EB-2 visa classification as an advanced degree professional, she did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页While the Petitioner has not withdrawn the appeal in this proceeding, the Petitioner is presently a permanent resident and the issue in this proceeding is moot.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。
she did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页the issue in this proceeding is moot.查看英文原件 · 第 1 页美国公民及移民服务局 行政上诉办公室 非先例决定
案号：37434165 日期：2025年5月9日
对德克萨斯服务中心决定的上诉
表格I-140，外籍工人移民申请（国家利益豁免）
申请人是一名商业管理领域的企业家及培训与发展专家，寻求以持有高级学位的专业人士身份获得职业移民第二优先（EB-2）移民分类，并寻求对此分类所附工作要求（即劳工证要求）的国家利益豁免。见《移民与国籍法》（该法）第203(b)(2)条，8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)。
服务中心运营处拒绝了该申请，认定尽管申请人已证明其符合作为高级学位专业人士的 underlying EB-2签证分类资格，但其未能证明豁免所要求的工作邀请、并因此豁免劳工证将符合国家利益。此事现依据8 C.F.R. § 103.3提交本办公室进行上诉审查。
美国公民及移民服务局记录显示，申请人已有一份获批的移民申请，并已于2025年4月调整身份为美国永久居民。尽管申请人未撤回本程序中的上诉，但申请人目前是永久居民，本程序中的问题已无实际意义。
裁定：上诉被驳回。
原文：USCIS 非先例裁决 PDF（2025-05-09）
本页为 USCIS 公开的 AAO 非先例裁决译文，不是美杰华经手的案例，不构成法律意见；个案结果取决于各自证据。翻译模型：deepseek-flash，生成于 2026-11-01。
