NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2025年5月15日）

案件背景

申请人寻求EB-2职业移民分类（作为持有高级学位的专业人士或具有特殊能力的人士），并请求国家利益豁免，免除该分类所附的职位邀请要求。此前服务中心以未证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益为由拒绝申请；后续上诉、复议动议、合并重新开案与复议动议、重新开案动议均被驳回。本次为再次提出的重新开案动议。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   服务中心以申请人未证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益为由拒绝申请。

   核对原文依据

   Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   上诉被驳回。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed a subsequent appeal, motion to reconsider, combined motion to reopen and reconsider, and motion to reopen.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 复议动议

   复议动议被驳回。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed a subsequent appeal, motion to reconsider, combined motion to reopen and reconsider, and motion to reopen.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
4. 合并重新开案与复议动议

   合并重新开案与复议动议被驳回。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed a subsequent appeal, motion to reconsider, combined motion to reopen and reconsider, and motion to reopen.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
5. 重新开案动议

   重新开案动议被驳回；该次动议中申请人提交了额外文件，但未提交与证明此前因重大变化而驳回动议有误相关的新事实。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed a subsequent appeal, motion to reconsider, combined motion to reopen and reconsider, and motion to reopen.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   We found that though the Petitioner submitted additional documentation on motion to reopen, he had not submitted any new facts related to establishing we erred in dismissing the prior motion due to material change.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
6. 本次重新开案动议

   申请人提交三份总统行政命令、网络安全和基础设施安全局2024-2026财年战略计划、商务部文件及关于网络安全专家短缺的文章，主张其提供“IT治理和网络安全服务”的事业具有国家影响并产生重大积极经济效果；AAO审查后驳回该动议。

   核对原文依据

   On motion, the Petitioner submits three presidential executive orders indicating the administration's intent to "support the responsible growth and use of digital assets, blockchain technology, and related technologies," establish "the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology to unite the brightest minds from academia, industry, and government," and revoke "certain existing AI policies and directives that act as barriers to American AI innovation." The Petitioner also submits the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's strategic plan for fiscal year 2024-2026; a document from the Department of Commerce presenting its cybersecurity goals; and articles addressing the need for and a shortage of cybersecurity experts.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   [c ]ybersecurity services generates national implications . . . and produces substantial positive economic effects.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   ORDER: The motion to reopen is dismissed.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：本案为重新开案动议程序，审查范围限于最新一次驳回动议的决定；所提交的行政命令、政府战略文件及文章未被用于重新认定国家利益豁免资格。
  核对原文依据

  Therefore, we will only consider new evidence to the extent that it pertains to our latest decision dismissing the motion to reopen.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：核对本次动议提交材料时，应区分“提交了新文件”与“提出了证明先前决定有误的新事实”；AAO的驳回理由在于后者未获确立。
  核对原文依据

  Similarly, here, the Petitioner has submitted new documentation on instant motion but has not provided new facts to establish that we erred in dismissing the prior motion.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：原申请的国家利益豁免实体问题在本决定中未被重新审理，不能从本次动议驳回推导出对原申请实体资格的新的认定。
  核对原文依据

  We will not re-adjudicate the petition anew and, therefore, the underlying petition remains denied.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页