NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2023年11月8日）

案件背景

申请人以专业成员身份持有高级学位申请第二优先职业移民，并请求国家利益豁免职位邀请要求；原申请为I-140表格。原审德州服务中心主任依Matter of Dhanasar框架拒绝，认为未证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益。后续上诉因未提交书面论证意见或补充证据而被简易驳回；本次为合并提出的重新开放动议与复议动议。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   德州服务中心主任拒绝I-140申请，认定申请人未依Matter of Dhanasar框架证明豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish that a waiver of the required job offer and thus of the labor certification would be in the national interest

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   申请人就主任决定提出上诉；因未提交书面论证意见或补充证据说明简易驳回中的法律或事实错误，AAO对后续上诉作简易驳回。

   核对原文依据

   We summarily dismissed a subsequent appeal because the Petitioner did not submit a brief or additional evidence specifying any erroneous conclusion oflaw or statement of fact in our summary dismissal.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 上诉阶段补交材料

   申请人于2022年12月13日提交I-290B表格提出上诉；书面论证意见于2023年2月15日送达，超过提交上诉后30天期限（应于2023年1月12日前提交），且寄往德州服务中心而非AAO。

   核对原文依据

   The Petitioner filed Form 1-290B to appeal the Director's decision on December 13, 2022, and was required to submit their brief within 30 days, or before January 12, 2023. The Petitioner's brief was delivered over 30 days later on February 15, 2023.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   the Petitioner sent the brief or additional evidence in support of their appeal to the USCIS Texas Service Center and not the Administrative Appeals Office as instructed in the Form I-290B instructions

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
4. 动议

   申请人合并提出重新开放动议与复议动议，提交I-797收据通知、I-290B收据通知及USPS Click-n-Ship投递记录，主张其已及时提交上诉书面论证意见或补充证据。

   核对原文依据

   On motion, the Petitioner submits USCIS Form 1-797, Notice of Action, Receipt Notice for USCIS Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion filed in connection with the Petitioner's appeal and United States Postal Service (USPS) Click-n-Ship label records indicating delivery of the Form I-290B and appeal brief.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：核对I-290B表格提交日期（2022年12月13日）与书面论证意见送达日期（2023年2月15日），以及I-290B说明中关于上诉后30天内向AAO提交书面论证意见的要求；本案认定COVID-19弹性不适用于该30天期限。
  核对原文依据

  The form instructions require submission of a brief or additional evidence within 30 days of filing an appeal on Form 1-290B.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：核对书面论证意见的寄送对象是否为AAO；本案认定寄往德州服务中心不符合I-290B说明。
  核对原文依据

  the Petitioner sent the brief or additional evidence in support of their appeal to the USCIS Texas Service Center and not the Administrative Appeals Office as instructed in the Form I-290B instructions

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
• 阅读提示：复议动议须针对AAO最新先前决定指出法律或政策适用错误并附相关先例；本案认定申请人未提出此类理由。
  核对原文依据

  But the Petitioner did not state any reasons for the reconsideration of our most recent prior decision to deny their motion to reopen accompanied by any pertinent precedent decision establishing that our decision was incorrect based on an erroneous application of law of USCIS policy to the existing evidence of record.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页