NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2025年10月21日）

案件背景

申请人以I-140表格寻求第二优先职业移民分类，主张其为高等学位专业人士或特殊能力人士，并请求国家利益豁免职位邀请要求；本次程序为针对AAO先前决定提出的重新开放动议。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   服务中心运营处（SCOPS）拒绝原申请，认定申请人未确立基础职业移民分类资格，也未确立豁免职位邀请及劳工证符合国家利益。

   核对原文依据

   Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish eligibility for the underlying immigrant classification, or that a waiver of the required job offer, and thus of the labor certification, would be in the national interest.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 动议

   SCOPS随后驳回合并的重新开放与复议动议；申请人就该合并动议决定提出上诉，AAO撤回SCOPS的合并动议决定并发回。

   核对原文依据

   SCOPS also dismissed a subsequent combined motion to reopen and motion to reconsider. The Petitioner appealed SCOPS' combined motion decision. We withdrew SCOPS' combined motion decision and we remanded the matter.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 动议

   SCOPS再次驳回合并动议；AAO驳回申请人的第二次上诉及随后合并的重新开放与复议动议，认定拟议事业不会具有国家重要性。

   核对原文依据

   SCOPS again dismissed the combined motion, and we dismissed the Petitioner's second appeal and a subsequent combined motion to reopen and motion to reconsider, concluding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that the proposed endeavor would have national importance

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
4. 动议

   AAO因时效问题驳回若干动议；并驳回申请人最近一次重新开放动议，理由是该动议未提供有文件证据支持的新事实以证明AAO此前将前一动议认定为逾期有误。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed the Petitioner's most recent motion to reopen because it did not provide new facts, supported by documentary evidence, that establish we erred by dismissing the preceding motion as untimely.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
5. 动议

   2024年7月16日AAO作出先前决定；指定USCIS收件地点于2024年8月28日收到重新开放动议，AAO于2024年10月2日以收件日超过33天为由驳回。

   核对原文依据

   on October 2, 2024, we dismissed the Petitioner's motion to reopen that the designated U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) filing location received on August 28, 2024

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

   that receipt date is more than 33 days after the date of our preceding decision in the matter, July 16, 2024

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
6. 动议

   2025年2月13日AAO驳回后续重新开放动议，认定申请人未证明前一重新开放动议的迟延既合理又超出其控制。

   核对原文依据

   On February 13, 2025, we dismissed the Petitioner's subsequent motion to reopen because it did not establish that his delay in filing the preceding motion to reopen was both reasonable and beyond his control

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
7. 动议

   指定收件地点于2025年3月27日收到重新开放动议；AAO于2025年4月23日以收件日超过2025年2月13日决定后33天为由驳回。

   核对原文依据

   On April 23, 2025, we dismissed the Petitioner's motion to reopen that the designated users filing location received on March 27, 2025, because that receipt date is more than 33 days after the date of our prior decision, February 13, 2025

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
8. 动议

   申请人随后提交另一重新开放动议，主张USCIS错误拒绝其在2025年2月13日决定与2025年3月27日收到动议之间提交的一份动议，称拒绝原因是USCIS对付款的处理错误；AAO驳回该动议，因主张缺乏文件证据支持。

   核对原文依据

   In that motion, he asserted that users erroneously rejected a motion he submitted between our decision dated February 13, 2025, and the motion that the designated users filing location received on March 27, 2025, characterizing the rejection basis as users' error regarding the Petitioner's payment.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

   However, we dismissed that motion to reopen because the Petitioner did not support his assertions with documentary evidence, as required by 8 e.F.R. § 103.5(a)(2).

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
9. 动议

   申请人提交本次重新开放动议，重新提交已在记录中的证据副本，包括商业计划摘录、申请人与区域总监协议摘录及参考书摘录。

   核对原文依据

   With that motion, the Petitioner resubmits copies of evidence already in the record, including excerpts from a business plan, excerpts from a regional director agreement between the Petitioner and the

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
10. 动议

    申请人在提交本次重新开放动议之后，另行提交其称为第五次动议提交副本、G-1450表格副本、简短陈述副本及被错误拒绝动议副本的文件。

    核对原文依据

    After the Petitioner filed the instant motion to reopen, he subsequently submitted documents that he describes as "a copy of the fifth motion filing including a copy ofthe Form G-1450, a copy ofthe brief statement and a copy of the erroneously rejected motion related to this matter."

    查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
11. 动议

    AAO本次审查重新开放动议并决定驳回。

    核对原文依据

    Upon review, we will dismiss the motion.

    查看英文原件 · 第 1 页

    ORDER: The motion to reopen is dismissed.

    查看英文原件 · 第 3 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：核对本次动议随附材料是否与记录中已有商业计划摘录、区域总监协议摘录及参考书摘录相同，以理解AAO为何认定不构成新事实。
  核对原文依据

  Because the record already contains copies of the evidence the Petitioner resubmits on motion to reopen, that is not documentary evidence of new facts.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：核对I-290B表格说明关于书面论证意见和额外证据须随动议提交的要求，以及AAO对动议提交后补交材料不予处理的范围。
  核对原文依据

  Unlike an appeal, you must submit any brief and/or additional evidence with your motion.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：本次决定对拟议事业国家重要性的表述是附带复核，并非重新审理原申请；不得据此推断原申请其他要素已被重新认定。
  核对原文依据

  Despite the Petitioner not establishing a new fact, supported by documentary evidence submitted at the time the Petitioner filed the motion, we reviewed the record in its entirety.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

  would not demonstrate that the proposed endeavor would have national importance, which 1s dispositive.

  查看英文原件 · 第 3 页