兽医助理 · NIW 国家利益豁免：动议驳回（2024年10月30日）

案件背景

申请人以兽医助理身份提交I-140表格，寻求EB-2第二优先职业移民分类（高等学位专业人士）并申请国家利益豁免，免除该分类附带的职位邀请要求。

审理经过

1. 初次决定

   德州服务中心主任拒绝该申请，认定记录未能证明申请人处于有利地位以推进其事业，也未能证明整体上豁免职位邀请要求会使美国受益。

   核对原文依据

   The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the Petitioner was well-positioned to advance her endeavor or that, on balance, it would benefit the United States to waive the job offer requirement.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
2. 上诉

   AAO驳回后续上诉，维持主任关于申请人未处于有利地位推进拟议事业的认定，同时撤回主任此前关于申请人符合EB-2特殊能力分类资格以及拟议事业具有国家重要性的认定。

   核对原文依据

   We dismissed a subsequent appeal, affirming the Director's finding that the Petitioner was not well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, while withdrawing the Director's previous findings that the Petitioner was eligible for the EB-2 immigrant classification as an individual ofexceptional ability and that the Petitioner's proposed endeavor was of national importance.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
3. 动议

   申请人提交合并的重开与复议动议，AAO以简易程序驳回，指出其书面论证意见未直接回应先前决定的结论，且提交的是已在记录中的相同证据。

   核对原文依据

   The Petitioner then filed a combined motion to reopen and reconsider, which we summarily dismissed. We indicated that the Petitioner's brief did not directly address the conclusions from our prior decision and the Petitioner offered the same evidence already on record in support.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
4. 动议

   案件现以第二次合并重开与复议动议提交AAO；审查范围限于最新决定，即简易驳回前次重开与复议动议的决定。

   核对原文依据

   The matter is now before us on a second combined motion to reopen and reconsider. Notably, our review on motion is limited to reviewing our latest decision, which is the decision to summarily dismiss the previous motions to reopen and reconsider.

   查看英文原件 · 第 1 页
5. 动议

   申请人在第二次动议中不争辩第一次动议被简易驳回，提交书面论证意见及已在记录中的证据副本，承认先前动议未具体指出先前决定中的错误法律结论或事实陈述，现提出复议理由。

   核对原文依据

   In her second motion, the Petitioner does not contest the summary dismissal of her first motion. She submits a brief and copies of evidence already in the record.

   查看英文原件 · 第 2 页

逐项证据分析

按争议点查看申请主张、原审意见、具体证据与 AAO 理由。点击每项标题可展开或收起。

阅读提示与适用边界

以下为基于本案的材料核对提示，不是 AAO 对其他案件的裁定。

• 阅读提示：核对第二次动议提交的书面论证意见与证据副本是否与已有记录重复，以及是否具体指出先前简易驳回决定中的错误法律结论或事实陈述；这对应复议动议的审查边界。
  核对原文依据

  She submits a brief and copies of evidence already in the record.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：核对第二次动议是否提出任何新事实或新的文件证据；这对应重开动议的审查边界。
  核对原文依据

  because the Petitioner has not presented new facts, her motion to reopen will be dismissed.

  查看英文原件 · 第 2 页
• 阅读提示：本案审查范围限于最新决定，即简易驳回前次动议的决定，不涉及对原申请EB-2资格或国家利益豁免三要素的重新实质审查。
  核对原文依据

  our review on motion is limited to reviewing our latest decision

  查看英文原件 · 第 1 页