行政先例 · 绿卡与身份调整
Matter of Park
以欺诈取得J交流访问者身份者仍受两年回国居住要求限制
15 I&N Dec. 436 (BIA 1975)
韩国籍交流访问者以欺诈方式取得J签证入境后未参加原定交流项目,移民法官拒绝其以永久居民配偶身份申请调整身份的重新开案动议。移民上诉委员会认定,明知而欺诈取得J身份者仍属INA第212(e)条适用范围,在未履行两年回国居住要求、未获豁免或未证明免除前不得申请调整身份。
所引用的裁判规则
INA第212(e)条涵盖明知而以欺诈方式取得J交流访问者身份的人;此类人在履行两年回国居住要求、取得豁免或证明免除前,不得申请调整身份。
适用范围
适用于明知而以欺诈方式取得J交流访问者身份或入境的人;明确区别于身份仅被错误给予、被误导接受或非自愿接受身份的情形。
查看官方引用与核查记录
核查日期:2026-11-04 · 官方判决来源
- 第3章 - J交流访问者身份条款与条件
[^ 12] See INA 212(e) , INA 214(l) , and INA 248 . See Friedberger v. Schultz , 616 F. Supp. 1315 (D.C. Pa. 1985). An exchange visitor could be subject to the 2-year foreign residence requirement even if the J visa was obtained by fraud. See Espejo v. INS , 311 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2002), and Matter of Park (PDF) , 15 I&N Dec. 436 (BIA 1975).
以上记录用于核对官方对具体规则的引用。部分推翻、法律修订或有管辖权法院的后续判决,可能影响其适用范围。
完整中文参考译文,按原文页码与段落对应,保留标题、引注及脚注。官方文本为英文原件。
原文第 1 页
Interim., Decision #2423
临时决定,决定编号#2423
MATTER OF PARK:
PARK案:
In DePortation Proceedings
驱逐出境程序
A-20515081
A-20515081
Decided by Board August 25, 1975
1975年8月25日由委员会裁定
(1) The language of section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, encompasses a person who fraudulently gains admission to the United States or ac- quires status after admission as an exchange visitor under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Act, as amended, with the knowledge that he is being accorded such status. ; (2) Notwithstanding respondent, who was admitted to the United States as a nonimmi- grant exchange-visitor under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Act, as amended, alleges that he obtained his nonimmigrant visa through fraud and after admission to this country never participated in the exchange program to which he was destined, he is ineligible to apply for adjustment of his status to that of a lawful permanent resident under section 245 of the Act, as amended, until he has either fulfilled the foreign residence require- ment of section 2,12(e) of the Act, as amended, secured a waiver thereof, or established that he is Otherwise exempt therefrom. Accordingly, the immigration judge was correct in denying respondent's motion to reopen td applyfbi section 245 adjustment of status.
(1) 经修正的《移民与国籍法》第212(e)条的语言,涵盖以下人员:其以欺诈方式获得进入美国,或在根据经修正的该法第101(a)(15)(J)条作为交流访问者入境后取得身份,且明知其被赋予该身份。;(2) 尽管作为根据经修正的该法第101(a)(15)(J)条获准进入美国的非移民交流访问者的被申请人声称,其通过欺诈获得非移民签证,且在进入美国后从未参加其被指定前往的交流项目,但其不符合根据经修正的该法第245条申请将其身份调整身份为合法永久居民的条件,直至其满足经修正的该法第2,12(e)条的外国居留要求、获得该要求的豁免,或证明其以其他方式豁免于该要求。因此,移民法官拒绝被申请人重新开放以申请第245条调整身份的动议是正确的。
CHARGE:. :•ug : ; • • Order: Act of 1952--Sectiou' 241(a)(9) U.S.C. 1251(a)(9)}—After admission as . , • „ (nonimmigrant, failed to comply with conditions of status
指控::•ug : ; • • 裁定:1952年法——第241(a)(9)条 U.S.C. 1251(a)(9)}——作为非移民入境后,未能遵守身份条件
ON BEHA o:EdRgsiarDENT't• Bert D. Greenberg, Esquire
代表 respondent:Bert D. Greenberg 律师
•.• • • , .:„ , 5670 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1800 Los Angeles, California 90036 ,
•.• • • , .:„ , 5670 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1800 Los Angeles, California 90036 ,
This is an appeal from the immigration judge's April 9, 1974 denial of a motion to reopen deportation proceedings in order to permit the re- spondent to apply for discretionary relief under section 212(i) and sec- tion 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The appeal will be dismissed. The respondent is a 27-year-old married male alien, native and citizen of Korea, who was admitted to the United States on August 3, 1972 as a nonimmigrant exchange visitor under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Act. At a hearing before an immigration judge on May 16, 1973, the respon- dent admitted the truth of the factual allegations of the order to show cause (Exh. 1) and conceded deportability for noncompliance with his exchange visitor status as specified therein. The immigration judge found him to be deportable as charged and granted him voluntary
本上诉针对移民法官1974年4月9日拒绝重新开庭驱逐出境程序的动议,该动议旨在允许 respondent 根据《移民与国籍法》第212(i)条和第245条申请酌情救济。上诉将被驳回。 respondent 是一名27岁已婚男性外国人,韩国国民和公民,于1972年8月3日根据该法第101(a)(15)(J)条作为非移民交流访问者入境美国。在1973年5月16日移民法官主持的听证中,respondent 承认了说明理由令(Exh. 1)事实指控的真实性,并承认因未遵守其中指明的交流访问者身份而可被驱逐出境。移民法官认定其如所指控可被驱逐出境,并准予其自愿
436
436
原文第 2 页
Interim Decision #2423
临时决定#2423
departure.-No appeal, was taken from the immigration judge's decision. On February 25, 1974 the respondent was accorded preference status as the spouse 'of a lawful permanent resident under section 203(a)(2) of the Act. On March 20, 1974 the respondent filed an application for status as a permanent resident and sought reopening of his deportation hear- ing. 1 The respondent also applied for a waiver of excludability under section 212(a)(19), pursuant to the provisions of section 212(1) of the Act. See 8 CPR 242.17(a): On April 9, 1974 the immigration judge denied the motion to reopen on the ground that the respondent, having been admitted to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(J), was ineligible to apply for permanent resident until he had either fulfilled the foreign residency requirement contained in section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, secured a waiver thereof, or estab- lished that he was Otherwise exempt therefrom. 2
离境——未对移民法官的决定提出上诉。 1974年2月25日,根据该法第203(a)(2)条,被申请人被给予合法永久居民配偶的优先地位。1974年3月20日,被申请人提交了永久居民身份申请,并寻求重新开启其驱逐出境听证。1 被申请人还根据该法第212(1)条的规定,申请了第212(a)(19)条下的入境禁止豁免。见8 CPR 242.17(a):1974年4月9日,移民法官以被申请人系根据第101(a)(15)(J)条获准进入美国、因而在满足经修正的《移民与国籍法》第212(e)条所载外国居留要求、获得该要求的豁免、或证明其本可免于该要求之前不符合申请永久居民资格为由,驳回了重新开启的动议。2
An application for permanent resident status was previously filed by the respondent on January 2, 1973 and denied by the district director on March 15, 1973. This earlier application was superseded when the respondent filed a new Form I-485 on March 20, 1974 in conjunction with his motion to reopen.
respondent 此前曾于1973年1月2日提交永久居民身份申请,并于1973年3月15日被地区主任拒绝。当 respondent 于1974年3月20日结合其重新开庭动议提交新的 I-485 表格时,该较早的申请被取代。
2 Section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, provides: "(e) No person admitted under section 101 (a)(15)(J) or acquiring such status after admission whose a) participation in the program for which he came to the United States was financed in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, by an agency of the Government of the United States or by the government of the country of his nationality or his last residence, or (ii) who at the time of admission or acquisition of status under section 101(a)(15)(J) was a national or resident of a country which the Secretary of State, pursuant to regulations prescribed by him, had designated as dearly requiring the services of persons engaged in the field of specialized knowledge or skill in which the alien was engaged, shall be eligible to apply for an immigrant visa, or for permanent residence, or for a nonimmigrant visa under section 101(a)(15)(H) or section 101. (a)(15XL) until it is established that such person has resided and been physically present in the country of his nationality or his last residence for an aggregate of at least two years following departure from the United States: Provided, That upon the favor- able recommendation of the Secretary of State, pursuant to the request of an interested United States Government agency, or of the Commissioner of Immigration and Natu- ralization after he has determined that departure from the United States would impose exceptional hardship upon the alien's spouse or child (if such spouse or child is a citizen of the United States or a lawfully resident alien,) or that the alien cannot return to the country of his nationality or last residence because he would be subject to persecution on account of /nee, religion, or political opinion, the Attorney General may waive the requirement of such two-year foreign residence abroad in the case of an alien whose admission to the United States is found by the Attorney General to be.in. the public interest: And provided further, That the Attorney General may, upon the favorable recommendation of the Secretary of State, waive such two-year foreign residence requirement in any case in which the foreign country of the alien's nationality or last residence has furnished the Secretary of State a statement in writing that it has no objection to such waiver in the case of such alien." (Emphasis Supplied.) The program for which the respondent was admitted comes within subsection (ii) of the above provision.
2 经修正的《移民与国籍法》第212(e)条规定: “(e) 任何根据第101(a)(15)(J)条入境或入境后取得该身份的人员,如果 a) 其参加来美所参加的项目的经费全部或部分、直接或间接由美国政府机构或由其国籍国或最后居留地政府资助,或 (ii) 其在根据第101(a)(15)(J)条入境或取得身份时,是国务卿依据其制定的法规指定为明确需要该外国人从事的专门知识或技能领域人员服务的国家的国民或居民,则不得申请移民签证、永久居留,或第101(a)(15)(H)条或第101(a)(15)(L)条下的非移民签证,直至证明该人员在离开美国后已在其国籍国或最后居留地居住并实际停留累计至少2年:但前提是,经国务卿根据相关美国政府机构的请求作出有利推荐,或在移民与归化局局长认定离开美国将对外国人的配偶或子女(如果该配偶或子女是美国公民或合法居民外国人)造成特殊困难,或认定该外国人因种族、宗教或政治观点而会受到迫害以致无法返回其国籍国或最后居留地后,司法部长可以豁免该外国人两年外国居留的要求,前提是司法部长认定该外国人入境美国符合公共利益:并进一步规定,司法部长可以在外国人的国籍国或最后居留地已向国务卿提交书面声明表示对该外国人的此类豁免无异议的任何案件中,经国务卿有利推荐,豁免该两年外国居留要求。”(着重号为原文所加。)respondent 入境所参加的项目属于上述条款的(ii)小节。
437
437
原文第 3 页
Interim Decision #2423
临时决定#2423
On appeal counsel contends that the respondent is not affected by the bar to permanent residence contained in amended section 212(e). Coun- sel's theory 13 that the respondent was never a bona fide exchange visitor. He alleges that the respondent obtained his nonimmigrant visa through fraud, and never participated in the exchange program to which he was destined after his admission to the United States. Counsel asserts that rather than a waiver of the foreign residency requirement of section 212(e), the respondent requires, and is eligible for, a waiver of inadmissibility for visa fraud (section 212(a)(19)) pursuant to section 212(i) of the Act. We reject counsel's contention. We construe the language of amended section 212(e) to encompass .a person who fraudulently gains admission to the United States or status as an exchange visitor, under section 101(a)(15)(J) with the knowledge that he is being accorded such status. 3 Any other interpretation would permit an alien who has perpetrated a willful fraud to reap the benefit of his own misdeed, and would allow the circumvention of the immigration laws through the exchange visitor program in contravention of the intent of Congress in establishing it. See S. Rept. 1608, 84th Congress, 2d. Sess. Accordingly, we conclude that the immigration judge was correct in finding the respondent subject to the provisions of amended section 212(e) and in denying reopening on that basis. The following order will therefore be entered. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed.
在上诉中,律师主张,被申请人不受到经修订的第212(e)条所载永久居留禁令的影响。律师的理论13是,被申请人从来不是真正的交流访问者。他声称,被申请人通过欺诈获得其非移民签证,并且在获准进入美国后从未参加其被指定前往的交流项目。律师主张,被申请人需要的不是第212(e)条外国居留要求的豁免,而是依据该法第212(i)条对签证欺诈(第212(a)(19)条)的不可入境性豁免,并且他有资格获得该豁免。我们驳回律师的主张。 我们将经修订的第212(e)条的语言解释为涵盖以下人员:在明知自己将被给予第101(a)(15)(J)条项下交流访问者身份的情况下,以欺诈方式获得进入美国或获得该身份。3 任何其他解释都会允许实施故意欺诈的外国人从其自身的不法行为中获益,并会允许通过交流访问者项目规避移民法,违背国会设立该项目时的意图。见S. Rept. 1608, 84th Congress, 2d. Sess.。因此,我们认定,移民法官认定被申请人受经修订的第212(e)条各项规定约束并据此拒绝重新开启程序是正确的。因此,将作出以下命令。 命令:上诉被驳回。
3 This view applies to instances involving fraud on the alien's part, and should be distinguished from situations in which it is claimed that exchange visitor status was merely erroneously accorded, or that the alien was misled into accepting it, or that his acceptance of the status was not voluntary. See, e.g. Matter of Wojcik, 11 1. & N. Dec. 603 (3 IA 1966); De Guzman v. INS, 389 F.2d 360 (C.A. 7, 1968); Campbell v. Esperdy, 287 F. Soup. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1968); Matter of Koryzma, 13 I. & N. Dec. 358 (BIA 1969); Hazer v. INS, 420 F.2d 3i7 (C.A. 9, 1970).
3 该观点适用于涉及外国人一方欺诈的情形,应与以下情形相区别:仅声称交流访问者身份被错误赋予,或外国人被误导接受该身份,或其接受该身份并非自愿。见,例如 Matter of Wojcik, 11 1. & N. Dec. 603 (3 IA 1966); De Guzman v. INS, 389 F.2d 360 (C.A. 7, 1968); Campbell v. Esperdy, 287 F. Soup. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1968); Matter of Koryzma, 13 I. & N. Dec. 358 (BIA 1969); Hazer v. INS, 420 F.2d 3i7 (C.A. 9, 1970)。
438
438